|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jun. 30, 2014
|
|||||||||||
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |||||||||||
| Basis Of Accounting Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Basis of Presentation The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and include all of the Company’s accounts and its wholly-owned subsidiaries CNS California and NTC. Certain information and note disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of our financial position as of June 30, 2014 and our operating results, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ deficit for the interim periods presented. The balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended September 30, 2013 which are included in our annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on December 23, 2013. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses in the financial statements. Examples of estimates subject to possible revision based upon the outcome of future events include, among others, recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of equity instruments, use and other taxes. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments, except as otherwise indicated) necessary for fair presentation for the periods presented as required by Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future periods or for the year ending September 30, 2014. |
||||||||||
| Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Basis of Consolidation The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, an inactive parent company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries CNS California and NTC, which is accounted for as a discontinued operation (Refer to Note 3.Discontinued Operations Transactions). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. |
||||||||||
| Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, doubtful accounts, intangible assets, income taxes, valuation of equity instruments, accrued liabilities, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. |
||||||||||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Cash The Company deposits its cash with major financial institutions and may at times exceed the federally insured limit of $250,000. At June 30, 2014 cash did not exceed the federally insured limit. The Company believes that the risk of loss is minimal. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses related to cash deposits with financial institutions. |
||||||||||
| Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Derivative Liabilities The Company applies Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815-40, “Derivatives and Hedging,” which provides a two-step model to determine whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock and thus able to qualify for the scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74. This standard triggers liability accounting on all instruments and embedded features exercisable at strike prices based on future equity-linked instruments issued at a lower rate. Using the criteria in ASC 815, the Company determines which instruments or embedded features that require liability accounting and records the fair values as a derivative liability. The changes in the values of the derivative liabilities are shown in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as “loss on derivative liabilities.” Effective November 28, 2012, the Company, together with the majority of the noteholders of each tranche of notes issued in October 2010, January 2011, October 2011 and February 2011 (the “Notes”)(see Note 4 below), agreed to amend the Notes, pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Consent, Note Amendment and Warrant Forfeiture Agreement (the “Note Agreement”), dated as of October 24, 2012, to (a) extend the maturity date of the Notes to October 1, 2013, (b) set the conversion price at $1.00, subject to adjustment as provided in the Notes and (c) remove full-ratchet anti-dilution protection. In addition, the holders forfeited the warrants they received in connection with the issuance of the Notes, and consented to the 2012 Bridge Financing, the issuance of the October 2012 Notes and to the subordination of the Notes to the October 2012 Notes. Both the convertible notes and warrants had contained ratchet provisions, which under ASC 815 required bifurcation of the conversion feature and warrants for derivative liability treatment. The interest rate on all the Notes remained unchanged at 9% per annum. Using the Black Scholes model, each tranche of Notes, as of November 28, 2012 were valued and compared with the value of the Notes on the prior day with their original maturity dates. The difference of the two valuation calculations of $556,300 was booked to Other Expenses as a gain on extinguishment of debt. Since November 28, 2012, with the elimination of the warrants and the removal of the ratchet in the convertible debt instruments, which have subsequently been converted into equity, the Company has had no derivative liabilities. |
||||||||||
| Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments ASC 825-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”) defines financial instruments and requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. The Company considers the carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, to approximate their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization. The Company also analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC 480-10 (formerly SFAS 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”), ASC 815-10 (formerly SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”) and ASC 815-40 (formerly EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”). The Company adopted ASC 820-10 (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) on January 1, 2008. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:
For the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no derivative liabilities or change in fair valuation thereon. As at June 30, 2014, the Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with ASC 825-10. |
||||||||||
| Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Unbilled Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Accounts Receivable The Company estimates the collectability of customer receivables on an ongoing basis by reviewing past-due invoices and assessing the current creditworthiness of each customer. Allowances are provided for specific receivables deemed to be at risk for collection. |
||||||||||
| Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Furniture and Equipment Fixed assets, which are recorded at cost, consist of office furniture and equipment and are depreciated over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis. The useful life of these assets is estimated to be between three and five years. Depreciation for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $7,800 and $10,100 respectively. Accumulated depreciation at June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $67,100 and $58,500, respectively. |
||||||||||
| Offerings Costs Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Offering Costs
The Company applies ASC 505-10, “Costs of an Equity Transaction”, for recognition of offering costs. In accordance with ASC 505-10, the Company treats incremental direct costs incurred to issue shares classified as equity, as a reduction of the proceeds. Direct costs incurred before shares classified as equity are issued are classified as an asset until the stock is issued. Indirect costs such as management salaries or other general and administrative expenses and deferred costs of an aborted offering are expensed. |
||||||||||
| Impairment Or Disposal Of Long-Lived Assets, Including Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Long-Lived Assets As required by ASC 350-30 (formerly SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), the Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost-carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate. The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value of the asset by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition. If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and fair value. No impairment loss was recorded for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The Company adopted Accounting standards update (“ASU”) 2012-02, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The new guidance is intended to reduce the complexity and costs of the annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets by allowing companies to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of impairment to determine whether it should perform a quantitative impairment test. |
||||||||||
| Trade And Other Accounts Payable [Policy Text Block] |
Accounts Payable
Accounts payable consists of trade payables of which $451,400 is for legal services. Between November 11, 2013 and December 20, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,446,380 shares of its Common Stock, as full and complete settlement of trade debt totaling an aggregate of $1,466,800 owed to two creditors who are also accredited investors. The fair market value of the shares that were issued in these transactions was determined to be $0.25 per share. The excess value of $1,105,200 over the fair market value of the issued shares was booked to Other Expenses as a gain on extinguishment of debt. |
||||||||||
| Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Revenues The Company recognizes revenue on services in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC No. 605, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized when we have evidence of an arrangement, a determinable fee, and when collection is considered to be probable and the services are delivered. |
||||||||||
| Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Research and Development Expenses The Company charges all research and development expenses to operations as incurred. |
||||||||||
| Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Advertising Expenses The Company charges all advertising expenses to operations as incurred. For the nine months ended June 30, 2014, no advertising expenses were incurred. For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 advertising expenses were $6,000. |
||||||||||
| Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Stock-Based Compensation The Company has adopted ASC 718-20 (formerly SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment - revised 2004) and related interpretations which establish the accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under ASC 718-20, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award (see Note 5 for further discussion on valuations). The expense is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period, generally the vesting period of the award. |
||||||||||
| Inducement To Convert Debt [Policy Text Block] |
Inducement to Convert Debt According to ASC 470-20-55, when a convertible debt instrument is converted to equity pursuant to an inducement offer, the debtor recognizes an expense equal to the fair value of all securities and other consideration transferred in the transaction in excess of the fair value of securities issuable pursuant to the original conversion terms. The fair value of the securities or other consideration is measured as of the date the inducement offer is accepted by the convertible debt holder. |
||||||||||
| Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) ASC 220-10 (formerly, SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income), requires disclosure of all components of comprehensive income (loss) on an annual and interim basis. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) is the same as its reported net income (loss) for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. |
||||||||||
| Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Earnings (Loss) per Share The Company has adopted GAAP regarding earnings (loss) per share, which requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share in conjunction with the disclosure of the methodology used in computing such earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue Common Stock were exercised and converted into Common Stock. |
||||||||||
| New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Apart from the below-mentioned recent accounting pronouncements, there are no new accounting pronouncements that are currently applicable to the Company. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The amendments in the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation, as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities. The Company does not expect the adoption of the standard update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360) Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. It also addresses sources of confusion and inconsistent application related to financial reporting of discontinued operations guidance in U.S. GAAP. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first quarter of 2015 for public organizations with calendar year ends. The Company does not expect the adoption of the standard update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this ASU state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This ASU applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company does not expect the adoption of the standard update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07 Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting, in order to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. In addition, the guidance provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. The Company does not expect the adoption of the standard update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04 Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date, in order to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in GAAP. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company does not expect the adoption of the standard update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. |